五经：王教之典籍，文化之本源

The Five Classics: The Canonical Scriptures of Kingship and the Wellspring of Chinese Culture

序章｜Prologue

“温柔敦厚，《诗》教也；疏通知远，《书》教也；广博易良，《乐》教也；絜静精微，《易》教也；恭俭庄敬，《礼》教也；属辞比事，《春秋》教也。”

—《礼记·经解》

"Gentle and sincere—that is the teaching of the Shi (Poetry). Broad and far-reaching—that is the teaching of the Shu (Documents). Vast and harmonious—that is the teaching of the Yue (Music). Pure, tranquil, and subtle—that is the teaching of the Yi (Changes). Reverent, frugal, solemn, and respectful—that is the teaching of the Li (Rites). Skillful in composition and comparison of events—that is the teaching of the Chunqiu (Spring and Autumn Annals)."

— Book of Rites, "Interpretation of the Classics"

西汉以降，博士官学所立之"五经"，实为《周易》《尚书》《诗经》《仪礼》《春秋》——即《六经》去《乐》之遗存。《乐经》之亡，如古乐之散佚于风，徒留其名于经目，而声容不可复闻。然五经独存，竟成两千年中华学术之骨架、士人精神之底色、文明认同之锚点。

From the Western Han dynasty onward, the "Five Classics" (五经, Wujing) established by the official Erudites (Boshi) comprised the Yijing (Classic of Changes), Shangshu (Venerated Documents), Shijing (Classic of Poetry), Yili (Ceremonial Rites), and Chunqiu (Spring and Autumn Annals)—the surviving corpus of the original "Six Classics" (六经, Liujing) after the loss of the Yuejing (Classic of Music). The disappearance of the Yuejing is like ancient music scattered into the wind: its name remains in the catalog of classics, but its sound and form can never be recovered. Yet the Five Classics alone endured, becoming the very skeleton of Chinese scholarship for two millennia, the foundational hue of the literati spirit, and the anchor of civilizational identity.

一、《六经》与《乐》之缺｜The Six Classics and the Loss of Music

1.1 孔子与"六经"之渊源

先秦文献中，《庄子·天运》已载孔子谓老聃曰："丘治《诗》《书》《礼》《乐》《易》《春秋》六经。"此虽为寓言笔法，却折射出战国中后期儒家已将这六部典籍视为一个整体序列。司马迁《史记·孔子世家》更明确说："孔子以《诗》《书》《礼》《乐》教，弟子盖三千焉。"

In pre-Qin literature, Zhuangzi·Tianyun records Confucius telling Lao Dan: "Qiu has studied the six classics—Shi, Shu, Li, Yue, Yi, and Chunqiu." Though couched in allegorical language, this reflects the Warring States period's view of these six texts as a unified corpus. Sima Qian's Records of the Grand Historian states more explicitly: "Confucius taught the Shi, Shu, Li, and Yue to disciples numbering around three thousand."

1.2 《乐》何以亡？

《乐经》之失，历来众说纷纭。一说秦火焚书，乐谱口传之物最易湮灭；一说《乐》本无经，乐之精神已寓于《礼》中——所谓"礼乐不可斯须去身"，《礼》载其仪，《乐》存其神，二者本为一体之两面。郑玄注《礼记》即云："乐所以修内也，礼所以修外也。"是以《仪礼》十七篇中，凡大礼必有乐节，乐即在礼中，不必别为一经。

The loss of the Yuejing has been debated for centuries. One theory attributes it to the Qin book-burning: musical notation, transmitted orally, was the most perishable. Another holds that there was never a separate Yuejing text at all—that the spirit of music was already embedded within the Li (Rites). As the saying goes, "Ritual and music must not be separated from one's person for a moment." The Li records the outer forms; music expresses the inner spirit. The two are two sides of one coin. Zheng Xuan's commentary on the Book of Rites states: "Music cultivates the inner; ritual cultivates the outer." Indeed, within the seventeen chapters of the Yili, every major rite includes musical accompaniment—music is already within ritual; a separate classic was unnecessary.

1.3 五经格局之定

汉武帝建元五年（前136年）置五经博士，正式确立五经为官学核心。自此，"五经"之名取代"六经"，成为此后两千年经学体系之主轴。东汉熹平石经、曹魏正始石经、唐开成石经、清乾隆石经——一代代帝王勒石刊经，五经始终居于正中。

In 136 BCE, Emperor Wu of Han established Erudite positions for the Five Classics, officially making them the core of state-sponsored learning. From then on, the term "Five Classics" replaced "Six Classics" as the central axis of the two-thousand-year classical studies tradition. From the Xiping Stone Classics of the Eastern Han to the Zhengshi Stone Classics of Cao Wei, the Kaicheng Stone Classics of Tang, and the Qianlong Stone Classics of Qing—generation after generation of emperors carved the classics in stone, and the Five Classics always occupied the center.

二、《周易》：絜静精微，穷理尽性｜The Yijing: Pure, Subtle, and All-Encompassing

2.1 从卜筮到哲学

《周易》最初是一部占筮之书——"昔者圣人之作《易》也，幽赞于神明而生蓍"（《说卦》）。但其真正伟大的命运转折，在于它从一部"算命手册"升华为一套宇宙论体系。阴阳二爻交错而成六十四卦，卦卦相生，爻爻变动，构成一个动态的世界模型。

The Yijing (Classic of Changes) began as a divination manual—"In ancient times, the sages created the Yi by invoking the spiritual to generate the yarrow stalks" (Shuogua). Its true greatness lies in its transformation from a fortune-telling handbook into a cosmological system. The interplay of yin and yang lines generates sixty-four hexagrams; each hexagram gives rise to others; every line is in flux—together they form a dynamic model of the world.

2.2 "易"之三义

郑玄释"易"有三义：变易（change）、简易（simplicity）、不易（constancy）。宇宙万物瞬息万变（变易），但其运行法则至简至易（简易），而此法则本身恒常不变（不易）。这三者看似矛盾，实则统一——正如《系辞》所言："易简而天下之理得矣。"

Zheng Xuan identified three meanings of yi (change): bianyi​ (change/transformation), jianyi​ (simplicity/ease), and buyi​ (constancy/immutability). All things in the cosmos are in constant flux (bianyi), yet the principles governing them are supremely simple (jianyi), and those principles themselves are eternally constant (buyi). These three appear contradictory but are unified—as the Xici (Great Commentary) states: "Simplicity and ease—and the principles of all under heaven are thereby attained."

2.3 汉学视域中的《易》

西汉象数之学（孟喜、京房）将《易》与天文历法、阴阳灾异相连，构建出一套精密的宇宙-政治对应系统。东汉虞翻创"纳甲""飞伏"之说，郑玄注《易》兼采爻辰。至王弼扫象言理，以老庄解《易》，开启义理一脉。此后"象数"与"义理"之争贯穿经学史，恰如西方经院哲学中"字面义"与"寓意"之争。

Western Han "image-number" scholarship (Meng Xi, Jing Fang) linked the Yi to astronomy, calendrics, and yin-yang omens, constructing an elaborate cosmos-political correspondence system. Eastern Han scholar Yu Fan developed the "Na Jia" and "Fei Fu" methods; Zheng Xuan's commentary incorporated "line-positions." Wang Bi later swept away the images to speak of principle, interpreting the Yi through Lao-Zhuang thought, inaugurating the "meaning-and-principle" tradition. The subsequent debate between "image-number" and "meaning-principle" schools runs through the entire history of classical studies—not unlike the medieval Western scholastic debate between literal and allegorical interpretation.

Sinological Note:​ 理雅各（James Legge）于1882年出版 The Yi King（收录于 The Sacred Books of the East 第16卷），是西方世界第一部完整英译《周易》并附详注的著作。其译名 "I Ching" 沿用至今。卫礼贤（Richard Wilhelm）1924年德译本及贝恩斯（Cary Baynes）英译本则更强调其哲学与心理维度，深刻影响了荣格（Carl Jung）的"共时性"（synchronicity）理论。

三、《尚书》：疏通知远，政典之祖｜The Shangshu: Broad, Far-Reaching, and the Ancestor of Political Canon

3.1 "上古之书"

《尚书》者，"尚"即"上"，意为上古之书。它是中国现存最早的记言体史书，记载了从尧舜到秦穆公时期的政治文献——典、谟、训、诰、誓、命，六种文体，涵盖了帝王功业、君臣对话、战争誓词、册命文书。

The Shangshu (Venerated Documents, also known as the Shujing)—"Shang" means "above" or "ancient"; it is the "Book of Ancient Documents." It is China's earliest extant collection of political speeches and records, spanning from the times of Yao and Shun to Duke Mu of Qin. Its six genres—dian (canons), mo (councils), xun (instructions), gao (announcements), shi (oaths), and ming (commands)—cover imperial achievements, court dialogues, battle oaths, and investiture documents.

3.2 今古文之争——经学史上最大的悬案

《尚书》的命运是中国经学史上最富戏剧性的篇章。秦火之后，济南伏生壁藏《尚书》，汉初以今文（隶书）传出二十八篇，立于学官，是为今文《尚书》。

武帝末，鲁恭王坏孔子宅，得古文《尚书》（以先秦蝌蚪文书写），比今文多出十六篇，孔安国献之，未立学官，是为古文《尚书》。

至东晋，梅赜献《古文尚书》五十八篇——其中三十三篇为伏生今文之翻版，二十五篇为新增。此本流传千余年，直至清初阎若璩以《尚书古文疏证》铁证如山，证其为伪作。这一"伪古文《尚书》"案，堪称中国学术史上最著名的辨伪公案。

The fate of the Shangshu is the most dramatic chapter in Chinese classical studies. After the Qin book-burning, Fu Sheng of Jinan hid the text in a wall; in the early Han, he transmitted twenty-eight chapters in "New Script" (clerical script), which were officially recognized as the New Script Shangshu.

Toward the end of Emperor Wu's reign, King Gong of Lu dismantled Confucius's old residence and discovered the "Old Script Shangshu" (written in pre-Qin tadpole script), containing sixteen additional chapters. Kong Anguo presented it to the court, but it was never officially established—this was the Old Script Shangshu.

In the Eastern Jin, Mei Ze presented a fifty-eight-chapter version—thirty-three being reworkings of Fu Sheng's text, and twenty-five newly added. This version circulated for over a thousand years until the early Qing scholar Yan Ruoju, in his Evidential Studies on the Old Script Shangshu, conclusively proved the twenty-five new chapters to be forgeries. The "Forged Old Script Shangshu" case stands as the most famous textual authentication controversy in Chinese intellectual history.

3.3 核心思想：天命靡常，惟德是辅

《尚书·周书》中的核心命题——"皇天无亲，惟德是辅"（《蔡仲之命》）、"天视自我民视，天听自我民听"（《泰誓》）——将政治合法性从"天命"转向"德"与"民"，奠定了中国政治思想中"民本"与"敬天保民"的基调。

The core proposition of the Zhou Documents section—"Great Heaven has no favorites; it assists only the virtuous" (Command to Cai Zhong), and "Heaven's sight is from our people's sight; Heaven's hearing is from our people's hearing" (Grand Oath)—shifts political legitimacy from "Heaven's mandate" to "virtue" and "the people," establishing the foundational tone of "people-centeredness" and "revering Heaven while protecting the people" in Chinese political thought.

Sinological Note:​ 理雅各于1865年出版 The Shoo King（Sacred Books of the East 第3卷），其译名 "Shoo King" 为威妥玛拼音时代的产物。当代汉学界更常用 The Book of Documents 或 The Classic of History。法国汉学家沙畹（Édouard Chavannes）虽未全译，但其对《尚书》中上古地理与民族的研究影响深远。

四、《诗经》：温柔敦厚，思无邪｜The Shijing: Gentle, Sincere, and Without Depravity

4.1 风、雅、颂——三百零五篇的宇宙

《诗经》共305篇（另有6篇笙诗有目无辞），分为风（十五国风，160篇，各地民歌）、雅（小雅74篇、大雅31篇，朝廷乐歌）、颂（周颂31篇、鲁颂4篇、商颂5篇，宗庙祭祀乐歌）。

The Shijing (Classic of Poetry) contains 305 poems (plus 6 instrumental pieces with titles but no text), divided into Feng​ (Airs—160 folk songs from fifteen states), Ya​ (Odes—74 Lesser Odes and 31 Greater Odes, court hymns), and Song​ (Hymns—31 Zhou Hymns, 4 Lu Hymns, 5 Shang Hymns, temple sacrificial songs).

4.2 孔子与《诗》的教化

"诗三百，一言以蔽之，曰：思无邪。"（《论语·为政》）孔子对《诗》的重视，不仅在于其文学价值，更在于其道德教化功能。"不学《诗》，无以言"——春秋时代的外交场合，赋诗言志是诸侯卿大夫的基本技能。一部诗集，竟是当时的"外交辞令手册"。

"The three hundred poems—in one phrase: 'Think no depravity.'" (Analects 2.2). Confucius valued the Shi not only for its literary merit but for its moral-educative function. "Without studying the Shi, one cannot speak." In the Spring and Autumn period, reciting poems to express intent was a basic skill of diplomats and ministers. A poetry collection served, in effect, as the era's "diplomatic phrasebook."

4.3 毛诗与三家诗之争

汉代《诗》学有四家：鲁诗（申培）、齐诗（辕固生）、韩诗（韩婴）为今文经学，立于学官；毛诗（毛亨、毛苌）为古文经学，未立学官。四家说诗各有不同，尤以"美刺"说（赞美与讽刺）为政治解读之核心。东汉郑玄作《毛诗笺》，融会今古文，使毛诗独传至今，三家诗则先后亡佚（韩诗仅存《韩诗外传》）。

The Han dynasty had four schools of Shi interpretation: the Lu​ (Shen Pei), Qi​ (Yuan Gusheng), and Han​ (Han Ying) schools were New Script and officially recognized; the Mao​ school (Mao Heng, Mao Chang) was Old Script and not officially recognized. The four schools differed significantly, especially in their "praise-and-satire" (meici) political readings. Zheng Xuan's Mao Shi Jian (Commentary on Mao's Poetry) synthesized New and Old Script traditions, enabling the Mao version to survive alone; the other three schools gradually perished (only Han Ying's Outer Commentary on the Han Shi survives).

4.4 从"经"到"诗"——现代性的回归

五四以降，以胡适、顾颉刚为代表的"古史辨"派将《诗经》从"经"的圣坛上拉下，还原为"古代歌谣总集"。闻一多《诗经新义》、陈子展《诗经直解》等著作，以文学、民俗学视角重新解读。这一"去经学化"过程，恰如西方圣经批判学将《旧约》从"神谕"还原为"古代近东文献"。

Sinological Note:​ 阿瑟·韦利（Arthur Waley）1937年出版 The Book of Songs，以流畅的现代英语韵文翻译，在西方影响极大。1954年，瑞典汉学家高本汉（Bernhard Karlgren）出版 The Book of Odes，以严谨的语言学方法逐篇考订古音古义。当代学者如宇文所安（Stephen Owen）则更关注其文学性与文化语境。

五、《仪礼》：恭俭庄敬，礼序乾坤｜The Yili: Reverent, Solemn, and Ordering Heaven and Earth

5.1 为何是《仪礼》而非《周礼》？

西汉博士官学所立之"礼"，实为《仪礼》（当时称《礼》或《士礼》），而非《周礼》。《周礼》（原名《周官》）至刘歆始推崇，王莽时方立于学官。《礼记》则是戴德、戴圣所编之"记"，属传注类，东汉虽重之，但直至唐代《礼记》才取代《仪礼》成为"五经"之一（即"九经"格局中的变化）。

The "Li" established by Western Han Erudites was the Yili (Ceremonial Rites, then called simply Li or Shi Li), not the Zhouli (Rites of Zhou). The Zhouli (originally titled Zhouguan) was only promoted by Liu Xin and officially recognized under Wang Mang. The Liji (Book of Rites) was a collection of commentaries compiled by Dai De and Dai Sheng. Though highly valued in the Eastern Han, it was not until the Tang dynasty that the Liji replaced the Yili as one of the "Five Classics" (in the "Nine Classics" reorganization).

5.2 十七篇：冠、婚、丧、祭、乡、射、朝、聘

《仪礼》十七篇涵盖古代士人一生及政治生活中的核心礼仪：士冠礼（成年礼）、士昏礼（婚礼）、士丧礼与既夕礼（丧礼）、士虞礼（葬后安魂礼）、特牲馈食礼与少牢馈食礼（祭祀）、乡饮酒礼与乡射礼（地方社交与射箭仪式）、燕礼（诸侯宴饮）、大射仪（天子诸侯大射）、聘礼（诸侯聘问）、公食大夫礼（国君宴大夫）、觐礼（诸侯朝天子）。

The seventeen chapters of the Yili cover the core rites of an educated man's life and political career: the capping rite (coming of age), the wedding rite, mourning rites, post-burial soul-settling rites, sacrificial rites, village drinking and archery rites, court banquets, grand archery ceremonies, diplomatic visits, and the imperial audience rite.

5.3 礼之精神：秩序与温情

礼不仅是外在的仪式规范，更是内在情感的节制与表达。"礼者，因人之情而为之节文"（《礼记·坊记》）。丧礼之哀、婚礼之敬、乡饮之序——礼将人的情感纳入一个可共享、可传承的符号系统中，使个体经验转化为集体记忆。

Ritual is not merely external formal regulation; it is the restraint and expression of inner emotion. "Ritual follows human feelings and provides them with measured patterns." (Book of Rites, Fang Ji). The grief of mourning rites, the reverence of wedding rites, the order of village drinking—ritual channels human emotion into a shareable, transmissible symbolic system, transforming individual experience into collective memory.

Sinological Note:​ 19世纪末，法国汉学家古斯塔夫·施莱格尔（Gustave Schlegel）在《天地会》研究中大量引用《仪礼》以考证中国秘密会社的仪式渊源。当代人类学家如华琛（James L. Watson）研究华南丧葬仪式时，仍追溯至《仪礼》的"士丧礼"传统，可见其活的遗产。

六、《春秋》：属辞比事，微言大义｜The Chunqiu: Skillful Composition, Subtle Words with Grand Meaning

6.1 一部鲁国编年史的宏大命运

《春秋》本是鲁国史官所记编年史，起于鲁隐公元年（前722年），迄于鲁哀公十四年（前481年），凡242年。经文极简——最短者仅一字（"螟"——虫灾），最长者不过四十余字。然而孟子说："孔子作《春秋》而乱臣贼子惧。"一部极简的编年史，何以有如此震慑力？

The Chunqiu (Spring and Autumn Annals) was originally the chronicle kept by Lu state historians, covering 242 years from 722 to 481 BCE. The text is extremely terse—the shortest entry is a single character ("Ming"—locusts); the longest runs just over forty characters. Yet Mencius said: "When Confucius completed the Chunqiu, rebellious ministers and villainous sons were struck with fear." How could such a terse chronicle possess such power?

6.2 三传之争：《公羊》《穀梁》《左传》

理解《春秋》必须借助"传"。汉代形成三传并立的局面：

《公羊》之学在西汉达到顶峰。董仲舒以"天人感应"说解《公羊》，提出"大一统""张三世""通三统"等命题，直接影响了汉武帝的"罢黜百家，独尊儒术"。清代庄存与、刘逢禄复兴公羊学，又经龚自珍、魏源而至康有为，成为晚清变法维新的理论武器。

《左传》则以丰富的叙事著称，其文学成就与《史记》并称。晋杜预注、唐孔颖达疏，构成《左传》注疏之双璧。

The Gongyang​ tradition reached its peak in the Western Han. Dong Zhongshu interpreted it through "Heaven-human resonance," proposing concepts like "Great Unity" (da yitong), the "Three Ages" (san shi), and the "Three Dynastic Successions" (tong san tong), directly influencing Emperor Wu's "dismiss the hundred schools, revere only Confucianism." In the Qing, Zhuang Cunyu and Liu Fenglu revived Gongyang studies, which passed through Gong Zizhen and Wei Yuan to Kang Youwei, becoming the theoretical weapon of the late Qing Reform Movement.

The Zuozhuan, famed for its rich narratives, rivals the Records of the Grand Historian in literary achievement. Du Yu's commentary (Jin dynasty) and Kong Yingda's sub-commentary (Tang) form the twin pillars of Zuozhuan scholarship.

6.3 "春秋笔法"——最古老的叙事政治学

"春秋笔法"即"一字褒贬"：杀君曰"弑"（贬），杀有罪之君曰"诛"（褒）；非天子不书"狩"——用词的选择本身就是政治判断。这种"微言大义"的叙事方式，影响了中国两千年的史书写作传统（从《史记》到《资治通鉴》），也深刻影响了东亚汉文化圈的史学观念。

The "Spring and Autumn brushwork" (Chunqiu bifa) means "one character of praise or blame": killing a ruler is written as shi (regicide—derogatory); killing a guilty ruler is zhu (execution—commendatory). Only the Son of Heaven may "hunt"; anyone else is recorded differently. Word choice itself is a political judgment. This "subtle words with grand meaning" narrative style influenced two millennia of Chinese historiography—from the Shiji to the Zizhi Tongjian—and profoundly shaped the historical consciousness of the entire East Asian Sinographic sphere.

Sinological Note:​ 理雅各于1872年出版 The Ch'un Ts'ew（附《左传》译文，Sacred Books of the East 第5卷）。20世纪，华裔学者陈荣捷（Wing-tsit Chan）在 A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy 中对《春秋》三传的选译，成为西方哲学课堂的标配读物。

七、五经与中国文化思维｜The Five Classics and the Chinese Mental Framework

7.1 五经如何塑造了中国人的思维方式？

7.2 经学作为"解释学循环"

五经并非五本各自独立的书，而是一个互文性（intertextuality）极强的系统。郑玄遍注群经，试图建立一个统一的经学解释体系——以《礼》解《诗》，以《易》解《春秋》，以《书》证《礼》。这种"以一经解群经"的方法，与西方中世纪以《圣经》统摄一切知识的"经院哲学"有异曲同工之妙。

The Five Classics are not five independent books but a deeply intertextual system. Zheng Xuan commented on all the classics, attempting to build a unified hermeneutic system—interpreting the Shi through the Li, the Chunqiu through the Yi, and verifying the Li through the Shu. This method of "using one classic to interpret all classics" parallels the medieval Western scholastic project of subsuming all knowledge under Sacred Scripture.

7.3 五经之现代命运

清末民初，经学崩解。1905年废科举，1912年蔡元培任教育总长，下令"小学读经科一律废止"。五经从"王教之典籍"跌落为"古代文献"。然而，有趣的是——当经学作为制度性存在消亡后，五经中的思想却以"文化基因"的方式继续存活于中国人的语言、习俗、伦理观念之中。

In the late Qing and early Republic, classical studies collapsed. The civil service examination was abolished in 1905; in 1912, Cai Yuanpei ordered the cessation of classic-reading in primary schools. The Five Classics fell from "canonical scriptures of kingship" to "ancient documents." Yet, ironically—after the institutional existence of classical studies perished, the ideas within the Five Classics survived as "cultural DNA," continuing to live in Chinese language, customs, and ethical concepts.

八、汉学视野中的五经｜The Five Classics in Sinological Perspective

8.1 西文译名小考

8.2 从"Missionary Scholarship"到"Academic Sinology"

早期西方对五经的认知，始于耶稣会士利玛窦（Matteo Ricci）等人的介绍。17-18世纪，以卫方济（François Noël）的 Sinensis Imperii Libri Classici（1711年，拉丁文《中国六经》）为代表，五经首次系统性地进入欧洲知识界，直接影响了莱布尼茨（Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz）对二进制与普遍文字的思考。

19世纪以降，随着汉学（Sinology）成为西方大学的正式学科，五经研究从"传教士的好奇"转变为"学术性的考据"。理雅各的巨著标志着这一转折。20世纪后半叶，以安乐哲（Roger T. Ames）、郝大维（David L. Hall）为代表的"波士顿儒家"学者，则试图以过程哲学（process philosophy）重新诠释五经中的宇宙论与伦理学。

Early Western knowledge of the Five Classics began with Jesuit introductions by Matteo Ricci and others. In the 17th-18th centuries, François Noël's Sinensis Imperii Libri Classici (1711, a Latin translation of the "Six Classics") brought the classics systematically into European intellectual circles, directly influencing Leibniz's reflections on binary arithmetic and a universal characteristic.

From the 19th century onward, as Sinology became a formal university discipline in the West, Five Classics studies shifted from "missionary curiosity" to "academic philology." James Legge's monumental work marked this transition. In the late 20th century, scholars like Roger T. Ames and David L. Hall, associated with "Boston Confucianism," have attempted to reinterpret the cosmology and ethics of the Five Classics through process philosophy.

8.3 五经与"世界记忆"

2013年，中国国家典籍博物馆启动《中华再造善本》工程，以现代技术复制宋元以来五经善本。同年，联合国教科文组织将《诗经》韩文抄本等列入《世界记忆名录》。五经——这部"王教之典籍"，正在以新的形式参与全球文明对话。

In 2013, China launched the Reconstruction of Rare Editions of Chinese Classics project, using modern technology to reproduce fine editions of the Five Classics from the Song and Yuan dynasties onward. That same year, UNESCO inscribed Korean manuscript copies of the Shijing into the Memory of the World Register. The Five Classics—these "canonical scriptures of kingship"—are participating in global civilizational dialogue in new forms.

结语｜Epilogue

五经，起于先秦，立于汉武，传于千载。它们曾被帝王奉为治国之圭臬，曾被士人诵为修身之准绳，曾被疑古派斥为伪书，曾被新儒家誉为智慧之源。其命运之跌宕，恰如《易》之六爻——初九潜龙勿用，九五飞龙在天，上九亢龙有悔，而后又复归于用九"见群龙无首，吉"。

The Five Classics originated in pre-Qin times, were established under Emperor Wu of Han, and transmitted for a thousand years. They were once revered by emperors as the standard of governance, recited by scholars as the yardstick of self-cultivation, denounced by the Doubting Antiquity school as forgeries, and hailed by New Confucians as a source of wisdom. Their tumultuous fate is like the six lines of a hexagram in the Yi—the hidden dragon at the first line; the flying dragon at the fifth; the arrogant dragon at the top; and then returning to the use of the ninth: "See the flock of dragons without heads—auspicious."

无论你是否将五经视为"神圣经典"，它们都已是——而且将永远是——理解中国文明无法绕过的"源代码"。读懂五经，未必能让你"知天命"，但至少能让你理解：为何这片土地上的人们，两千年来始终在"述而不作"与"苟日新日日新"之间，寻找着那个微妙的平衡点。

Whether or not you regard the Five Classics as "sacred scripture," they are—and will forever remain—the "source code" for understanding Chinese civilization that cannot be bypassed. Reading the Five Classics may not enable you to "know the Mandate of Heaven," but it will at least help you understand why the people on this land, for two thousand years, have been seeking that delicate balance between "transmitting without creating" and "renewing day after day."

"经，常也。有五常之道，故曰五经。"

"Jing—that which is constant. It possesses the Way of the Five Constants, therefore it is called the Five Classics."

—《白虎通义·五经》

继续阅读：左传   温柔敦厚   思无邪   五经   周易   尚书   诗经   仪礼   春秋   庄子   天运   孔子   老聃   汉武帝   孟喜   京房

此文由 汉语字典 编辑，若您觉得有益，欢迎分享转发！：首页 > 诗书礼易春秋 » 五经：王教之典籍，文化之本源 The Five Classics: The Canonical Scriptures of Kingship and the Wellspring of Chinese